{
  "study_id": "NCT05047120",
  "agent": "framework",
  "run": 2,
  "p_primary_hypothesis_supported": 0.62,
  "effect_direction": "favours intervention",
  "effect_size_90pct_interval": {"low": 0.1, "high": 1.9, "metric": "Between-arm difference in 0-10 NRS pain change (positive = more pain reduction with HYP-CT)"},
  "moderator_prediction": "Higher-baseline-pain patients show larger session-level reductions (more room, more salient render); neuropathic pain responds somewhat less durably than nociceptive because daily bodily signals contradict the suggestion more often.",
  "claim_ids_used": ["PM-0023", "PM-0369", "PM-1286", "PM-0132", "PM-0232", "PM-0360", "PM-0092", "PM-0128", "PM-0137", "PM-0276", "PM-0337", "PM-0253"],
  "rationale": "Hypnotic induction bypasses the critical faculty so suggestions write to the render layer where pain is produced (PM-0023, PM-0369, PM-1286); a live PhD therapist in an inpatient room adds authority and rapport doors (PM-0232, PM-0360). The first primary is immediate pre-post session pain, the outcome the framework most favours: impact over duration (PM-0092), while education pays the normal tax of argument (PM-0128). Recordings add self-sourced repetition (PM-0253). Risk: n=88 and an active interactive comparator; if the report instead leads with 4-week weekly average pain, daily contradiction by new-SCI pain and lack of daylight verification predict attrition toward null (PM-0137, PM-0276, PM-0337)."
}