{
  "study_id": "NCT07731568",
  "agent": "framework",
  "run": 1,
  "p_primary_hypothesis_supported": 0.27,
  "effect_direction": "favours intervention",
  "effect_size_90pct_interval": {"low": -1.0, "high": 3.0, "metric": "Between-group difference in GAD-7 change, 0-21 scale, at 4 weeks (positive = larger reduction with NPT)"},
  "moderator_prediction": "Higher-baseline-anxiety students gain more from NPT over CBT: their anxiety is more identity-bound and resists CBT's argument-style restructuring, while NPT's enactment ('do what you fear') installs through action; low-baseline students hit floor effects in both arms.",
  "claim_ids_used": ["PM-1353", "PM-0056", "PM-0851", "PM-0218", "PM-0383", "PM-0145", "PM-0936", "PM-0090"],
  "rationale": "Framework favours NPT modestly: its principles are enactment rules (endure, act, seek what you fear), and enactment installs where assent does not (PM-1353, PM-0851), whereas CBT's cognitive restructuring is partly argument, a small deposit (PM-0056, PM-0145). Culturally congruent framing raises installed value and compatibility (PM-0218, PM-0090). But CBT also contains behavioural experiments, both arms share group delivery (PM-0383), online format, 4 weeks, and the same homework, so the contrast is narrow. With n=55 split across two active arms, a superiority test is underpowered; sponsor allegiance raises odds of a reported positive result somewhat. Expected difference ~1 GAD-7 point, interval spanning zero."
}